Keywords
Machiavelli
George Washington
Zachary Taylor
Dwight Eisenhower
George C. Marshall
Military Moderate Statesman
Civil-Military
Samuel Huntington
James Mattis
Donald Trump
How to Cite
Abstract
The recent firestorm over James Mattis’s resignation as Secretary of Defense revives a historically popular American belief in a distinctive model of democratic statesmanship—the military moderate. Borne out of the national public memory of the paradigmatic first president of the United States, the concept of this model establishes the public desirability of certain characteristics such as military professionalism, non-partisanship, and disdain for politics. These characteristics are particularly in demand under certain national conditions, specifically periods of stabilization and potential single-party domination. By briefly outlining some key ideas associated with the concept of the military moderate statesman, offering a few examples, and overlaying two relevant clarifying concepts from Machiavelli, this essay intends to open a new dialogue about this phenomenon and its place in American political thought.
Similar Articles
- Jonathan O'Neill, Traditionalist Conservatism and the Administrative State , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 2 (2018): Symposium: The Political Thought of Robert Nisbet
- Richard Avramenko, Editor’s Note , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- George W Carey, James McClellan (1937–2005) , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 34 (2005): Eric Voegelin’s <em>New Science of Politics</em>: A 50th Anniversary Symposium
- George W Carey, The Presidency , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 39 (2010): Symposia on American Constitutionalism and on Religion & Politics
- John Boersma, Leo Strauss on the Machiavellian Moment(s) in Aristotle , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 46 No. 1 (2022): Symposium on Political Theology
- John von Heyking, “Had Every Athenian Citizen Been a Socrates” , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 46 No. 1 (2022): Symposium on Political Theology
- James Zink, The Missouri Controversy at 200 , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 43 No. 2 (2019): Symposium: The Missouri Compromise at 200
- Ryan McKinnell, To Imitate the Ancients in the Hard Things or the Soft , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 43 No. 1 (2019): Essays
- Jeffrey Church, Elisabeth Ellis, Nicholas Tampio, Robert S. Taylor, Peter J. Steinberger, Michael Kryluk, Author Meets Critics: Jeffrey Church's Kant, Liberalism, and the Meaning of Life , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 48 No. 1 (2024): Essays
- Teresa M. Bejan, Wilfred McClay, George Thomas, Sonu Bedi, Teresa M. Bejan's Mere Civility: Disagreement and the Limits of Toleration , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 2 (2018): Symposium: The Political Thought of Robert Nisbet
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Kenneth L Deutsch, Interwar German-Speaking Emigrés and American Political Thought , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 29 (2000): A Symposium on Herbert J Storing
- Quentin P Taylor, Publius and Persuasion , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 31 (2002): A Symposium on Gerhart Niemeyer
- Victor Bruno, Philosophy, Mysticism, and World Empires , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 43 No. 1 (2019): Essays
- Paul Peterson, The Rhetorical Design and Theoretical Teaching of Federalist No. 10 , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 17 (1987): Symposium: The Constitutional Convention of 1787
- Richard Avramenko, The Gnostic and the Spoudaios , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 41 No. 1 (2017): Symposium: Eric Voegelin and the Ancients
- Nathan Pinkoski, Why Alasdair MacIntyre is not a Conservative Post-Liberal , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 43 No. 2 (2019): Symposium: The Missouri Compromise at 200
- Matthew Van Hook, Myth, Moderate, or Machiavellian? , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 2 (2020): Symposium: Leadership and the History of Political Thought
- George Thomas, Liberal Tolerance and Mere Civility , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 2 (2018): Symposium: The Political Thought of Robert Nisbet
- Eduardo Schmidt Passos, Carl Schmitt’s Political Theory during the Third Reich , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Grant Havers, Leo Strauss on Nazism , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany