Keywords
Benjamin Franklin
American Political Thought
Wit
political comedy
How to Cite
Abstract
This paper explores Benjamin Franklin’s use of satire, parody and literary hoax to address the relationship between religion and politics. In using humour and an occasionally more caustic wit, Franklin meant to prompt in his readers an awareness of the character and substance of religion and religious controversy. Considering the latter, Franklin deployed comic anecdotes to draw a distinction between the essential and epiphenomenal elements of religious belief, an exercise predicated on the assumption of a deep concordance across denominations and faiths regarding the essence of religion. Franklin found in humour a means to bound religion, drawing out a salutary space and a common religious core for both citizens and society.
Similar Articles
- Katherine Philippakis, Michael S. Kochin, Pimps, Cuckolds, and Philosophers , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 46 No. 2 (2022): Jefferson, Paine, Tolstoy, Frankenstein, and more!
- Douglas Walker, Michael Giles, Tocqueville Reconsidered: On Secular Morality and Religion’s Place in Liberal Democracy , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 43 No. 1 (2019): Essays
- Ryan McKinnell, Wit and Persuasion in Philosophic Courtiership , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 1 (2020): Symposium: Wit in the History of Political Thought
- V Bradley Lewis, Gerhart Niemeyer , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 31 (2002): A Symposium on Gerhart Niemeyer
- Scott P Segrest, Muhammad Iqbal's Reconstructed Islam , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 46 No. 1 (2022): Symposium on Political Theology
- James Read, John Adams and the Unpurchased Impact of Wealth , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Ryan McKinnell, To Imitate the Ancients in the Hard Things or the Soft , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 43 No. 1 (2019): Essays
- John Boersma, Adam Smith’s Eulogy for Self-Command , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 1 (2023): Political Theory and Economics, and other Essays
- Linda C Raeder, Edmund Burke , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 35 (2006): Symposia on Edmund Burke and on Russell Kirk’s <em>The Conservative Mind</em>
- Luke C Sheahan, Robert Nisbet , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 2 (2018): Symposium: The Political Thought of Robert Nisbet
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Kenneth L Deutsch, Interwar German-Speaking Emigrés and American Political Thought , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 29 (2000): A Symposium on Herbert J Storing
- Quentin P Taylor, Publius and Persuasion , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 31 (2002): A Symposium on Gerhart Niemeyer
- Victor Bruno, Philosophy, Mysticism, and World Empires , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 43 No. 1 (2019): Essays
- Paul Peterson, The Rhetorical Design and Theoretical Teaching of Federalist No. 10 , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 17 (1987): Symposium: The Constitutional Convention of 1787
- Richard Avramenko, The Gnostic and the Spoudaios , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 41 No. 1 (2017): Symposium: Eric Voegelin and the Ancients
- Nathan Pinkoski, Why Alasdair MacIntyre is not a Conservative Post-Liberal , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 43 No. 2 (2019): Symposium: The Missouri Compromise at 200
- Matthew Van Hook, Myth, Moderate, or Machiavellian? , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 2 (2020): Symposium: Leadership and the History of Political Thought
- George Thomas, Liberal Tolerance and Mere Civility , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 2 (2018): Symposium: The Political Thought of Robert Nisbet
- Eduardo Schmidt Passos, Carl Schmitt’s Political Theory during the Third Reich , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Grant Havers, Leo Strauss on Nazism , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany