Keywords
Stoicism
gnômê
virtue theory
liberalism
How to Cite
Abstract
Much has recently been written on the inevitable demise of liberalism because of a lack of virtue forming intermediary institutions. Liberalism, in its nearly three-century history, has always relied on a certain set of virtues within its citizenry. The absence of virtue forming institutions within liberalism suggests that liberals should look elsewhere for virtue. Adopting this line of thinking, this article suggests a lost virtue that might rescue liberalism from itself: what the Stoic philosopher Epictetus identifies as gnômê. Gnômê refers to our rational activity that according to the Stoics ought to be conformed to nature and, when practiced properly, aligns the basic reality of nature to the moral and ethical choices people make. “Gnomic education,” I argue, will teach citizens how to think in accordance with nature without institutional aid.
Similar Articles
- Christina Bambrick, The Promise of Virtue, Old and New , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 2 (2023): The Future Before Us: Early Career Women in Political Theory and Constitutional Studies
- Sarah Gustafson, Opening the American Heart , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 2 (2023): The Future Before Us: Early Career Women in Political Theory and Constitutional Studies
- John Boersma, Adam Smith’s Eulogy for Self-Command , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 1 (2023): Political Theory and Economics, and other Essays
- Michael Federici, Russell Kirk's Defense of the American Tradition , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 45 No. 2 (2021): Symposium: Russell Kirk in the 21st Century
- Brianne Wolf, Tocqueville and the Moral Economy of Bankruptcy in Nineteenth-Century America , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 2 (2023): The Future Before Us: Early Career Women in Political Theory and Constitutional Studies
- Max Smith, Machiavelli's Democratic Civil Religion in the Discourses on Livy , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 48 No. 1 (2024): Essays
- Robert J. Burton, Animating the Public Spirit , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 1 (2023): Political Theory and Economics, and other Essays
- Matthew D. Mendham, A Flawed Moralist? , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 2 (2020): Symposium: Leadership and the History of Political Thought
- Nathan Schlueter, Five More Questions for Antiliberal Conservatives , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 43 No. 2 (2019): Symposium: The Missouri Compromise at 200
- Luke Foster, The Duty of the Clercs to the Nation , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 45 No. 2 (2021): Symposium: Russell Kirk in the 21st Century
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Alexander J Groth, Michael Parenti and American Democracy , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 11 (1981): Reviews
- Richard Avramenko, Notes on Contributors , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 2 (2018): Symposium: The Political Thought of Robert Nisbet
- Richard Avramenko, Notes on Contributors , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 43 No. 1 (2019): Essays
- Walter Berns, Free Speech and Free Government , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 2 (1972): Reviews
- Samuel T Francis, Power and History , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 12 (1982): Symposium: Political Parties and the Madisonian Model
- Michael Promisel, Why Character Matters , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 2 (2020): Symposium: Leadership and the History of Political Thought
- Jerry Weinberger, But Which Gods Will Save Us? The Political Legacy of Nietzsche and Heidegger , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 16 (1986): In Memoriam and Reviews
- Nicholas Capaldi, John Stuart Mill’s Defense of Liberal Culture , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 24 (1995): John Stuart Mill and Liberalism: A Symposium
- David DesRosiers, “The Team Against the Committee” , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 32 (2003): A Symposium on Bertrand de Jouvenel
- Ronald M Peters, Political Theory, Political Science, and A Preface to Democratic Theory , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 7 (1977): Reviews